1. As to first MOTION TO DISMISS petitioner's Predicate Notice & Notice of
Petition & Petition were not signed or endorsed by "Landlord" or "Landlords
Counsel" but by a former employee.
2. As to second MOTION TO DISMISS petitioner was required to make as a
party DHPD as required in 'section 8' lease rider and law and agreement between
petitioner and DHPD and Federal Department of Housing and Urban
Development, as to which respondent will require a copy of all records/documents/
emails/memorandums for discovery.
3. Respondent requests and demands that as additional affirmative defenses
that petitioner engaged in systematic discrimination and harassment for reasons of
disability, respondent suffers from Photophobia and Myopia, and age, respondent
is over 40 years old in violation of various Federal, State and City Laws, regulations
and rules and/or Charter. Also that First CounterClaim be adjusted to $10,000,000
4. In the Interest of Justice and Due Process, respondent, acting pro se, requests
and demands in MOTION TO COMPEL sufficiently prior to trial petitioner's witness
list in order to prepare adequate defense.
WHEREFORE, respondent prays for the granting of an Order from the Court
dismissing petitioner's Motion in its entirety, and for all such and further relief that
this Court may deem just and appropriate.
Saturday, August 19, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment